Here talk about a critic calls Walter Pater, where he try to expose the purpose of criticism, for identify and understand the pleasure that art work give us.
He said many of artist try to do something notable for political and cultural area, because there are the idea of important is value of art and how inside in the society, but there are few that really doing something for pleasure, like a social and spiritual purpose. The same time he said that the art only exist for give us pleasure And is for this that the writer talk about the art, because for him the art is a pleasure a lot, like a food or something else; how he said "I delight the art. It is a drink, a feast. And this is the true reason why, much of the time, I choose to stress the great paintings and sculptures of history". And he said the new art is little different, and made a question what looks best?. He try to identify each artist with adjective, one adjective that is a pleasure, and this is not a duties; but when the art felt like a duty could be a bad art. Because the art industry try to show us this type of art. But, he said that uninhibited art that rules matters.
The link is
http://www.guardian.co.uk/artanddesign/jonathanjonesblog/2012/jan/11/art-criticism-pleasure-principle
This is all
xoxo.
No comments:
Post a Comment